l'aéronautique, le spatial, les choses de l'air et du vide, et leurs environnements au prise des SHS


Review Form

Nacelles. Past and Present of Aeronautics and Space.

Laboratoire FRAMESPA (UMR 5136) / Labex SMS

Université Toulouse - Jean Jaurès

5 allées Antonio Machado

31058 TOULOUSE Cedex 9

Review Form

Title of the article reviewed:

Date paper received for review:

Date of return of the review:

We will send this anonymous review form to the author of the article, as well as the article itself if you have made comments directly in the text (highlighting and inserting anonymous comments).

Therefore, please do not sign the attached review form (and make the changes in Word so that your comments in the text are anonymous), as they will be sent to the author for him/her to make the requested changes. Remember that this review is both to ensure the editorial quality of the journal as well as to help writer improve their articles, so please be polite as well as thorough in your review. The journal has the right to refuse an evaluation that does not respect the benevolence expected between colleagues or to ask for clarifications in order to complete an evaluation that is too imprecise.

You have two months to review the submitted article. Please let us know as soon as possible if you are not able to meet this deadline.

Please return this completed form to:

General Review:

Please check only one box per line.





Very Good


No relevant

Originality of the article, contribution to knowledge

Relevance to the journal’s scope and editorial policy

Methodology, conceptual and theoretical framework

Quality of logical reasoning and writing, well-organised, clear demonstration

Critical apparatus, reliability of data, comparison and use of sources

Overall article quality

General comments on the article: (qualities and problems from a theoretical and methodological point of view, quality of form and content):

Comments for the author: (must be detailed and specific and help the author improve her/his paper)

Results of the review:

1. Accepted without modifications

2. Accepted with minor changes

3. Accepted with significant changes1

4. Rejected

Please check only one box.

Would you agree to re-read the article after modifications? yes/no


1 In this case, the requested changes do not mean that the article will be published ; the article will be reviewed again by an expert.